the PSOE has breached the agreement reached with IU-ICV to support in the House of Congress an amendment to the State budget previously agreed with these formations, which share the parliamentary group. The amendment was intended to increase to 531 euros the annual supplement for pensioners who are paid a non-contributory and live in rent in 2011 for lack of a dwelling.
After this amendment be agreed with IU-ICV in discussions in committee held two weeks ago, in the voting that took place last night, the PSOE and PNV budgetary partners and the Canary Coalition broke down. The initiative received 170 votes in favor, 175 against and 1 abstention.
It so happens that the very Psoe 'sold' on Monday this amendment as one of its 'winks' to the left formations of the House and as a justification of the Budget do support social policies. Thus, in the Bulletin of the Socialist parliamentary group that every week is distributed to the media and under the headline 'capacity for agreement' is indicated intentionally that the Socialist Party "was capable of weaving complicity with CiU, ERC-IU-ICV and the Joint Budget Committee that binds to basic agreement with PNV and CC." The following are various amendments agreed between them, and without citing the specific authorship of the author of the same group, "also a pension supplement of 531 euros for non-contributory pensioners who live in rent without home ownership" .
overthrew the Socialist Group agreed this amendment and just 24 hours before the House of Congress has to vote today on another amendment to the pension freeze and ICV IU managed to save the veto imposed by the government not to be discussed 22 other budget initiatives of various groups in the House.
From IU-ICV is assessed that "this decision of the PSOE to prevent prosper our previously agreed amendment, which we consider very important for retirees with fewer resources, especially to the pension freeze imposed by the Government, is about unrest that has caused us to save the executive veto the amendment to be voted today to try to avoid just such a freeze on pensions. "
In his opinion, "this alleged 'punishment' to our parliamentary breach of a covenant before all getting the PSOE is detrimental to the thousands of pensioners with fewer resources that could have benefited from a more comprehensive aid to pay his rent. With decisions like that, the Government is increasingly difficult to maintain that they have some social budgets. "
After this amendment be agreed with IU-ICV in discussions in committee held two weeks ago, in the voting that took place last night, the PSOE and PNV budgetary partners and the Canary Coalition broke down. The initiative received 170 votes in favor, 175 against and 1 abstention.
It so happens that the very Psoe 'sold' on Monday this amendment as one of its 'winks' to the left formations of the House and as a justification of the Budget do support social policies. Thus, in the Bulletin of the Socialist parliamentary group that every week is distributed to the media and under the headline 'capacity for agreement' is indicated intentionally that the Socialist Party "was capable of weaving complicity with CiU, ERC-IU-ICV and the Joint Budget Committee that binds to basic agreement with PNV and CC." The following are various amendments agreed between them, and without citing the specific authorship of the author of the same group, "also a pension supplement of 531 euros for non-contributory pensioners who live in rent without home ownership" .
overthrew the Socialist Group agreed this amendment and just 24 hours before the House of Congress has to vote today on another amendment to the pension freeze and ICV IU managed to save the veto imposed by the government not to be discussed 22 other budget initiatives of various groups in the House.
From IU-ICV is assessed that "this decision of the PSOE to prevent prosper our previously agreed amendment, which we consider very important for retirees with fewer resources, especially to the pension freeze imposed by the Government, is about unrest that has caused us to save the executive veto the amendment to be voted today to try to avoid just such a freeze on pensions. "
In his opinion, "this alleged 'punishment' to our parliamentary breach of a covenant before all getting the PSOE is detrimental to the thousands of pensioners with fewer resources that could have benefited from a more comprehensive aid to pay his rent. With decisions like that, the Government is increasingly difficult to maintain that they have some social budgets. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment